L'Education aux Etats-Unis |
|||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Le talon d'Achille: la formation des enseignants: Ever since the National Commission on Excellence in Education released the 1983 report A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Education Reform , there has been a growing awareness in the United States that our K-12 educational system is not performing well. On todays standardized tests of basic knowledge and skills, American students compare poorly with those of other industrialized nationsand even some non-industrial onesranking close to last out of 21 countries. The average SAT score has fallen by more than 55 points since 1960. (...) There is no single culprit for our educational weaknesses, but the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (...)have identified a primary cause: American teachers do not receive good preparation in the teacher training programs they take in college . The reason for this is not hard to find. Education schools are not just weak or inadequate; they are based on fundamentally wrong premises. With rare exceptions, they assume that subject matter is much less important than method. Prospective teachers are taught how to teach rather than what to teach. Consequently, vast numbers of teachers are unqualified to teach the subjects to which they are assigned.
|
La dérive des sciences sociales vers le relativisme, source de la culture de l'ignorance dans l'enseignement secondaire américain:Un rapport de la Fordham Foundation: Where Did Social Studies Go Wrong?
Un rapport saisissant sur l'inculture des élites américaines! (ACTA)
Effective State Standards for U.S. History: A 2003 Report Card
Pour la défense de l'enseignement de l'histoire et de la géographie: The Best of Both Worlds: Blending History and Geography in the K-12 CurriculumL'éducation a été le thème central de la campagne présidentielle 2000 Education has emerged as one of the major issues in the 2000 presidential campaign. Surely many educators are gratified to see so much attention paid to their work, but there are dangers, too, as candidates compete to offer expansive new programs that may appeal to voters. Une critique radicale du pédagogisme aux Etats-Unis et de ses dégâts "Education Terminology Every Parent Must Understand"This use of jargon implies that the teacher cares more about your child's education than you do. After all, the teacher has been trained to use the most progressive methods available, so his or her knowledge on this subject shouldn't be questioned. What the teacher neglects to tell you is that the "research" she refers to is not necessarily supported by mainstream scientific inquiry (i.e., published in scientific journals within a specific discipline such as psychology). By using terminology that has either negative- or positive-sounding connotations, educators can succeed in silencing your opposition, simply because you don't understand the meaning of the words and phrases. Therefore, you should arrive at the teacher conference knowing the language teachers speak, just as you would have to do if you visited a foreign country. Apprendre ou "apprendre à apprendre"?Dans une étude "Do Hard Courses and Good Grades Enhance Cognitive Skills? " le Program on Education Policy and Governance de l'Université de Harvard, fait le point sur l'acquisition des capacités cognitives dans l'école publique (dominée par les pincipes pégagogistes) et les écoles classiques (désormais privées) où l'on enseigne les disciplines: The shopping mall high school has been criticized for its limited capacity to enhance student cognitive skills. Two studies comparing public and private schools find that students learn more in nonpublic schools, in part because private schools concentrate student efforts on academic pursuits. Yet the curriculum is only one of many differences between public and nonpublic schools that could account for the superior performance of private school graduates. And few, if any, studies focused exclusively on public schools have convincingly shown that the curriculum has much effect on student cognitive skill. L'enseignement classique des disciplines développe donc mieux les capacités cognitives que l'école multiactivités centrée sur "l'apprendre à apprendre" We are not at this time quite prepared to recommend a return to the medieval practice in which students tip professors according to the quality of their lectures and seminars. But we are inclined to endorse John Bishop's suggestion that college admissions be determined by substantive external examinations for which students can prepare by taking academic courses. Bishop found that Canadian students acquired more cognitive skill, if they attended high school in a province that required satisfactory performance on an external examination. He interprets these results by suggesting that students, when confronted by an external examination, have a greater incentive to take more academic courses and to study more assiduously. Our results are entirely consistent with his findings and interpretation. Our findings come from just one moderate sized Midwestern city. Since the education provided by River City schools seems to be considerably above the average, one cannot conclude from these results that students in all parts of the United States can enhance their cognitive skill simply by taking the more academic courses offered in their high school. Yet the findings should not for that reason be discounted. Conclusion: Pour "apprendre à apprendre", il sufit d'apprendre! Les débats clés:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
La lutte contre le pédagogisme aux Etats-Unis: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
![]() " Since the 1980's, there have been substantial efforts nation wide to weaken mathematics education in America, and these efforts have largely been successful. This is not a communist conspiracy. It flows from an honest desire to help the less fortunate. This effort is based on the misguided notion thatweaker mathematics will be helpful to the traditionally disadvantaged groups in our society. It is this effort, curiously known as reform, that is the root cause of what has come to be known as the math wars. (...)" |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() What is Core Knowledge? |
Les think-tanks américains:
|
Pour lire ces documents vous devez posséder ACROBAT READER
à télécharger gratuitement ci-dessous
![]() |
![]() |
|